Despite the fact that the government's own scientists were forced to concede, in a British court of law, that rising global temperatures cause identical rises in CO2 levels, 800 yrs. - 2,000 yrs. later; reversing the theory that it was CO2 levels that resulted in higher temperatures.
Despite the government's own scientists conceding the point in court, the thieves of No.10 Downing Street, have at a time when the NHS cannot afford to give the terminally ill drugs to keep them alive, fraudulently spent £93.6 million pounds of taxpayer's money,on the quango, but private company, Carbon Trust.
The aim of this pointless organisation (pointless, because we know that anthropological CO2 does not cause global warming, they admitted so in court) and the sole aim of carbon Trust is to persuade governments to reduce their CO2 emissions. An email would have been as efective.
As the whole point of reducing CO2 emissions was based on the UN's IPCC's fraudulent and unscientific statement that man's acticities in burning fossil fuels and the resulting CO2 emissions were the main cause of global warming.
These latter day, King Canutes were encouraged by politicians world wide to preach this rubbish, because it gave them an opportunity to thrust even more legislation on the electorate, and raise lots of lovely green taxes.
Therefore, logic demands that as it has been proved, beyond any reasonable doubt, that it is rising temperatures that cause rising CO2 levels, and man has nothing to do with it, the only way to prevent future rises in CO2 levels is to blow up the sun.
Here is my first proposal, we spend £20 million pounds on a rocket, crewed by the IPCC, Brown and his Government accompanied by Carbon Trust's management, who well armed with fire extiguishers will be sent to the sun to cool it down!
Or, ask how it is at a time when we cannot afford to give cancer patients, alzheimers sufferers, drugs; how it is that the Brown's government can fund a private company paid for by the taxpayer, for a fraudulent purpose?
Are these thieves in 10 Downing Street answerable to anyone at all, or have all our policemen and judiciary been bought and paid for?
Why aren't they in jail?
Am I calling Gordon Brown a Liar and a Thief, you bet your sweet life I am. He and Blair, the war criminal, lied their way into office with false declarations of intent, and neither of them nor their despotic, dictatorship of a governmentand have seldom told us, their paymasters, the truth.
Thursday, 27 August 2009
Tuesday, 18 August 2009
Is it Not Time We Killed The KIllers?
Is It Not Time We Killed the Killers?
A murder is reported almost daily. By murder I refer to the cold blooded killing of someone by beating, kicking, knifing, strangling or shooting etc.
Murders today are soaring and it’s the liberal elite in this country who are to blame. Fools who cry that state execution is legalised murder.
They would rather wring their hands and bleat of lessons to be learned than execute murderers. They claim that executions are not a deterrent to other would-be-killers, that’s rubbish, but even if it were true does it matter? At least we would be sure that the executed killer would never take another life, and save us the thousands of pounds cost of keeping him or her in prison.
The state has a duty to protect its citizens and it is failing to do so dismally.
We have a government more interested in obeying the wishes of the idiots of
When did any political party canvass with the slogan, “Vote for us and we’ll legislate to make you criminals, and do what’s best for the EU, bugger you and
Or, “We’ll tax you higher than any other nation in
The only way we can tame the feral gangs roaming the streets, the drug, knife and gun culture is to make them fear the law. Make them tremble at the thought of the punishment that will be meted out to them if they are convicted.
Is it not time to kill the killers, to thrash those who beat and cripple innocent members of the public, and those dealing in narcotics?
We can make our streets safe again, but not while the major political parties dominate Parliament.
Our Party–Your Party can make
You and I together can make it happen.
Please join me and let’s take our Country back from the thieves that stole it.
Only you can make it happen and you know what? Labour and Conservatives think that you’re to dim to bother with politics and can therefore, do what the hell they like.
Are they right? I don’t think so!
Tonyb.
Sunday, 16 August 2009
That's Just Not Justice, Jack
No one can ever
accuse Jack Straw of being anything but relentless in his endeavours to remove
any form of justice from our legal system. This sneaky little
man was responsible for introducing the crime of ‘Racial Harassment’ designed,
he claimed, ‘To stop the harassment of immigrants in their own homes.’
As usual with all
Straw’s legislation such a reasonable explanation hid its the real purpose,
which in the case of The Racial Harassment Bill, was to legislate against any
form of protest against the ever growing immigrant population.
It was even used to prosecute a CND protestor who while trudging back to
her car allowed the stars and stripes to trail in the mud.
I remember at the
time writing to the Attorney General, that obnoxious, instantly forgettable and
puffed up fellow, Tony Blair used to work for.
“Was it not a
perversion of justice,” I asked, “To use a law that had been debated through
Parliament as being needed to protect immigrants from harassment in their own
homes, for a completely different purpose?”
In his reply, the
arrogant bugger said that the government would continue to use any legislation
for any purpose it wanted.
The problem is,
as the much abused terrorism legislation has so clearly demonstrated, our
government, both national and local believe they can do whatever they like with
impunity. They believe that lying to get their required
legislation through parliament is legitimate.
It is not.
Consent obtained by deception is not true consent in law.
Which brings us
to Justice Minister, Jack Straw’s latest wheeze, to pressurise his Government’s
victims into forgoing their legal right to contest fixed penalty tickets or
speeding fines in court? He is legislating to make those
defending themselves in court, pay for the cost of the prosecution, even if they
win their case.
In other words he
is removing, by threats of huge financial punishment to those availing
themselves of their statutory rights. It is a transparent act of a conspiracy,
by the Ministry of Justice and the Crown Prosecution Service, to pervert the
course of justice.
One can only
assume that Jack Straw has either, finally cracked up, lost his marbles, gone
loopy-loo, round the bend, or suffers from the delusion that he’s some kind of
Mafia Don. No one in his right mind or with even the faintest
interest in justice could have conceived such an immoral and dictatorial piece
of legislation, which flies in the face of New Labour’s beloved, but watered
down, and therefore invalidated, EU version of The Universal Declaration of
Human Rights.
Pressurising
someone to plead guilty to an offence to which they are innocent, by use of an
increased financial penalty, even if they prove their case, is a criminal abuse
of power.
But then that’s
New Labour the New Slavers hallmark, a criminal abuse of our rights.
Thursday, 13 August 2009
Swine Flu - What They Haven't Told You
Swine Flu Pandemic - by Design?
72kgs Vaccine laced with live avian flu virus.
Perhaps you are not aware:
May 2009 Czech scientists discovered that vaccine supplied by Baxter, had been contaminated with live Avian Flu virus. A lethal contamination that could have caused a global pandemic and which, according to scientists could not possibly have happened by chance.
Accidental’ Contamination Of Vaccine With Live Avian Flu Virus Virtually Impossible
June 10th 2009, Austrian investigative journalist, Jane Burgermeister filed charges with the FBI at the Austrian Embassy OF THE UNITED STATES, accusing, President Obama, WHO, UN, Baxter and others ( you can read the complete list of charges: Here ) of engaging in bioterrorism by creating the Swine Flu virus to a design copied from the 1918 Spanish Flu Virus and of releasing it in Mexico. www.naturalnews.com/026503_pandemic_swine_flu_bioterrorism.html
Augst 2009, The Pakistan Daily publishes an article offering new evidence that the virus was man made and released deliberately with intent to create a global pandemic.
http://www.daily.pk/7780/new-evidence-that-the-%E2%80%98swine-flu%E2%80%99-pandemic-is-man-made/
One thing is beyond question, that the destruction of industry and culling the human race to between 1 -3 billion, is a stated aim of the UN.
Green policies will ensure that power becomes too expensive to use, thus causing the infrastructure to collapse, and already in America they have built 28 concentration/extermination camps.
Ask yourself, why is it that news of the accusations of bioterrorism, the deliberate contamination of vaccines, has never been mentioned in the British Media?
Why are the WHO insisting on whole population vaccinations for a flu that is less potent than normal flu?
Will you stand in line with your sleeve rolled up and waiting for a Baxter vaccine?
Take my advice and stick to Night Nurse and avoid both the vaccine and Tamiflu – like the plague.
Swine Flu - Your Children the Guinea Pigs
Why is the Department of Health so determined to use the untested experimental anti-viral, Tamiflu suspected of causing 12 child deaths in America, to our children en-mass? After all it is known that Tamiflu can cause respiratory problem, nightmares, and other problems in children. Tamiflu will not prevent anyone from catching the virus, but may shorten the symptoms by a day.
A Department of Health spokesman dismissed the Oxford researchers' claims that their findings would also apply to swine flu.
"The BMJ review is based on seasonal flu and not swine flu," he said. "As the authors note, the extent to which the findings can be applied to the current pandemic is questionable - after all, we already know that swine flu behaves differently to seasonal flu, and past pandemics have hit younger people hardest.
"Whilst there is doubt about how swine flu affects children, we believe a safety-first approach of offering anti-virals to everyone remains a sensible and responsible way forward."
He said the policy would be kept under review and people with mild symptoms "may find bed rest and over-the-counter flu remedies work for them.
"But for those who experience severe symptoms, the best scientific advice tells us that Tamiflu should still be taken as soon as possible - and to suggest otherwise is potentially dangerous.
"If people are in any doubt about whether to take Tamiflu, they should contact their GP."
Perhaps the DOH spokesman needs reminding that the enforced use of experimental drugs is expressly forbidden under the Nuremberg Code.
That includes the untested, 'swine flu' vaccine from, Baxters, 72 kilos of which was found to be contaminated by live Avian and Human flu virus, something that could not happen by accident and which has led to them, the WHO, UN, and President Obama being accused of manufacturing the hybrid Swine Flu virus, releasing it in Mexico in order to create a pandemic, thus enabling President Obama to order the compulsory vaccination of the entire American population. The vaccine to be used would be contaminated to create a worldwide pandemic.
How the NHS can justify buying a vaccine from a company that is either grossly negligent and ignored every biochemical rule in the book, or deliberately set out to create a pandemic, defies belief.
Someone far more cynical than I, may well enquire as to whether those procuring vaccines for the NHS, have a personal or vested interest in Baxter.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)