Seems to me that the perverts of New Labour, in their haste to prepare school kids to accept sexual advances from homosexuals as 'normal' as the same sex relationships they openly promote using 'gay' propoganda, have overlooked the consequences.
Anyone objecting or expressing their distaste for the flaunting by gays of their sexuality are labeled homophobic, and risk being prosecuted under criminal law.
Dissent is not allowed in New Labour's communist police state, which brings me to my quandary?
If, as the Government declares, in between robbing us blind, that all sexual orientations are equally valid, and to discriminate against them is a 'crime', perhaps they would care to outline their plans to offer the same protection under the law to paedophiles?
Is the Government at risk of being sued as paedophobic? Or by Heterosexuals for being Heterophobic?
Will local authorities fund Paedophile or Heterophobic Marches, or does Government support for celebrations of sexual orientation extend only to Gay Marches?
Anyone, who isn't a complete and utter dipstick, would insist that a person's sexuality, gay or straight, is their own private affair and should have no part to play in job selection etc.
Yes, there are people who find public displays of homosexuality, offensive, but to make that a 'crime', is even more so.
Insisting that the unnatural is natural, does not make it so. Quentin Crisp described homosexuality as 'this dreadful disease'.
If it was not for the the Government promoting 'this dreadful disease' as natural, wouldn't we be looking for a cure?
Sunday, 21 March 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)